Home Care Supply

Performance Marketing Case Study | Home Supply Care Products
Google Ads Performance Marketing

Turning Underperforming Ad Spend Into a Scalable Growth Engine

A 90-day Google Ads performance audit for a home supply care products business, uncovering budget inefficiencies, bidding issues, tracking gaps and a clear path to controlled growth.

Industry / CategoryHome Supply Care Products
MarketCanada
Primary ChannelGoogle Ads
Analysis Period90 Days
01 / The Challenge

Healthy on the surface. Inefficient underneath.

The account had generated strong reported online conversion value, but campaign-level performance revealed a structural problem: the advertising budget was not aligned with performance.

Over the 90-day period, approximately CA$72,717 was spent and CA$202,665 in reported online conversion value was generated, resulting in a 308% overall ROAS.

“The biggest opportunity wasn't simply spending more. It was making the existing budget work harder.” Performance marketing audit insight
308%Overall Account ROAS
CA$72.7K90-Day Ad Spend
CA$202.7KReported Conversion Value
83–762%ROAS Range Across Campaigns
02 / Performance Gap

Performance varied dramatically across campaigns.

A campaign-level view revealed that some of the strongest opportunities were receiving less budget than campaigns producing significantly lower returns.

CampaignSpendROASKey Finding
Canada-wide PMax – DoorsCA$5,254762%Strongest performer, underfunded
Shopping – DoorsCA$4,808489%Profitable but budget constrained
Bridgeport PMaxCA$1,821480%Strong CTR but underfunded
Shopping | TesoroCA$15,975185%Highest spend, weak return
Manual CPC – Shopping TesoroCA$4,245125%Inefficient bidding strategy
Burlington Store Visit PMaxCA$1,35783%*Modelled store visits, no verified purchase data
Key insight: the strongest campaign generated 762% ROAS but received only CA$58/day, while Shopping | Tesoro received CA$177/day at 185% ROAS.
03 / What We Discovered

Four structural issues were holding performance back.

01 — BUDGET ALLOCATION

Budget was allocated against performance.

The highest-spending campaign was not the highest-performing campaign. More than CA$15K in spend was sitting in underperforming campaigns, creating a major opportunity cost.

185% → 762%ROAS gap between major campaigns
02 — AUCTION COMPETITIVENESS

The account was losing auctions to rank.

Account-wide impression share loss was approximately 31.67% to budget and 53.82% to rank. This indicated that increasing spend alone would not solve the problem.

53.82%Impression share lost to rank
03 — BIDDING STRATEGY

Bidding settings were restricting growth.

Manual CPC, Maximise Clicks and overly restrictive Target ROAS / CPA settings were preventing several campaigns from optimising toward the desired commercial outcome.

6Bidding strategies reviewed
04 — DATA & ATTRIBUTION

Tracking quality limited decision-making.

Shopify integration alerts, unverified store-visit values, view-through conversions and missing offline conversion imports meant reported ROAS needed stronger data validation.

CriticalTracking foundation required attention
The Problems

Where efficiency was being lost.

×
Budget concentrated in weaker campaignsHigh-spend campaigns were producing lower returns.
×
Best campaign significantly underfundedHigh ROAS opportunity had limited daily budget.
×
Multiple PMax campaigns overlappedCampaign structure created potential internal auction cannibalisation.
×
Incomplete offline attributionShowroom revenue was not being imported into Google Ads.
The Opportunity

What the data made possible.

Reallocate existing budgetShift spend toward campaigns with stronger ROAS.
Improve bidding signalsAlign strategies with conversion value and commercial goals.
Simplify campaign architectureReduce overlap and concentrate conversion signals.
Build new acquisition channelsExpand Bath & Vanity Search and remarketing coverage.
04 / Our Strategy

A performance framework built around data, efficiency and controlled scale.

Instead of simply increasing media spend, the recommended strategy focused on reallocating, restructuring and scaling what was already working.

01

Fix the Data

Establish a reliable measurement foundation before making major scaling decisions.

  • Resolve Shopify integration issues
  • Clean primary conversion signals
  • Review attribution settings
  • Prepare offline conversion tracking
02

Reallocate Budget

Move spend from inefficient campaigns toward proven high-return opportunities.

  • Increase Canada-wide Doors PMax
  • Increase Shopping – Doors
  • Fund underperforming high-potential campaigns carefully
  • Reduce low-return Tesoro spend
03

Fix Bidding

Align campaign bidding with revenue objectives instead of traffic volume alone.

  • Manual CPC → Target ROAS
  • Maximise Clicks → Target ROAS
  • Relax overly restrictive tROAS settings
  • Add ROAS floors before scaling
04

Restructure PMax

Create a cleaner portfolio with stronger campaign separation and less overlap.

  • Reduce 7 PMax campaigns to 6
  • Consolidate overlapping Doors campaigns
  • Strengthen creative assets
  • Concentrate conversion signals
05

Expand Growth Channels

Use proven performance patterns to identify additional acquisition opportunities.

  • Launch Bath & Vanity remarketing
  • Launch Bath & Vanity Search
  • Target product viewers and cart abandoners
  • Expand high-intent keyword coverage
06

Scale Carefully

Protect algorithmic learning while increasing investment in the strongest campaign.

  • Increase budgets in controlled increments
  • Set a 500% tROAS floor before scale
  • Refresh assets before aggressive expansion
  • Monitor ROAS during the scaling period
05 / Budget Optimisation

Same budget. Better allocation.

The proposed reallocation maintained the total daily budget at approximately CA$809/day, shifting investment toward stronger-performing campaigns.

CampaignCurrent / DayROASProposed / DayChange
Canada-wide PMax – DoorsCA$58762%CA$95+CA$37
Remarketing – DoorsCA$100390%CA$110+CA$10
Shopping – DoorsCA$53489%CA$80+CA$27
Bridgeport PMaxCA$20480%CA$33+CA$13
Search | Interior DoorsCA$30231%CA$38+CA$8
Brand SpecificCA$24275%CA$28+CA$4
Shopping | TesoroCA$177185%CA$120−CA$57
Manual CPC – Shopping TesoroCA$47125%CA$30−CA$17
Store Visit PMaxCA$37CA$23−CA$14
Burlington Doors PMaxCA$30225%PausePause
Projected opportunity from the proposed reallocation: approximately +CA$25,444 in quarterly revenue from the same total advertising spend.
06 / Roadmap

From fixing the foundation to scaling the winners.

01
Months 1–2 · Fix & Reallocate

Make the existing budget more productive.

Tracking & ShopifyResolve integration and conversion-data issues.
Bidding MigrationMove selected campaigns toward Target ROAS.
Budget ReallocationShift spend toward stronger campaign economics.
Negative KeywordsClean search traffic and improve intent quality.
tROAS CorrectionRemove unnecessarily restrictive targets.
Mobile Bid ReviewReduce waste in weak mobile performance areas.
02
Months 3–6 · Scale & Expand

Turn optimisation into a repeatable growth system.

Scale Doors PMaxIncrease budget in controlled 20% increments.
Bath & Vanity RemarketingTarget viewers and cart abandoners.
Campaign ConsolidationReduce overlap and improve algorithmic learning.
Bath & Vanity SearchCapture additional high-intent category demand.
Offline Conversion ImportConnect showroom POS data to Google Ads.
Controlled ScalingProtect efficiency while expanding spend.
07 / Projected Business Impact

A clear path to more revenue without simply increasing spend.

The audit identified multiple quantified opportunities across budget reallocation, campaign scaling and new channel expansion.

+CA$25KProjected quarterly revenue from budget reallocation
+CA$91KProjected Phase 2 revenue opportunity from scaled Doors PMax
308→347%Projected ROAS improvement
CA$0Additional budget required for Phase 1 optimisation

Note: The figures in this section are audit-based projections and recommendations from the supplied analysis document. They should not be represented as achieved post-implementation results unless independently verified.

08 / Transformation

From fragmented performance to a structured growth framework.

Before — Key Issues

  • Budget concentrated in low-performing campaigns
  • Best campaign significantly underfunded
  • 53.82% impression share lost to rank
  • Multiple bidding strategies misaligned with revenue goals
  • 7 PMax campaigns with potential overlap
  • Incomplete offline attribution
  • Unverified store-visit revenue
  • Limited Bath & Vanity acquisition coverage

After — Recommended State

  • Budget aligned with campaign profitability
  • High-performing campaigns positioned for controlled scale
  • Simplified PMax structure
  • Revenue-focused bidding strategies
  • Stronger conversion-data foundation
  • Reduced campaign cannibalisation
  • New Bath & Vanity acquisition channels
  • Offline showroom revenue incorporated into attribution
09 / Key Takeaway

Performance marketing isn't always about spending more. It's about making every dollar work harder.

The biggest opportunity identified in this account was not simply an increase in advertising spend. It was understanding where the budget was going, why certain campaigns were underperforming, what was already working and how resources could be redistributed intelligently.

By combining campaign restructuring, bidding optimisation, budget reallocation, conversion tracking and controlled scaling, the account had a clear framework for stronger efficiency and sustainable growth.

Performance Marketing

Find where your ad budget is being wasted — and where your next growth opportunity lies.

We use data-driven performance analysis to identify inefficiencies, improve campaign economics and build scalable acquisition systems.

Request for Meeting